Our Debate on If we should have a World Police has been structured by our Researchers and Debaters of which include Anton Miller, Shaun Uppal and Adam Norris each working to argue in a debate against the opposition who are anti-world police. This is their research:
Adam NorrisPeacekeeping missions happen in the most dangerous and difficult environments in the world. Dealing with conflicts and or the aftermath which others cannot or will not address.
A pre-emptive strike is a military action captured by a country in response to a threat from another country. The purpose of it is to stop the threatening country from carrying out its threat.
Anton Miller and Shaun Uppal
If we don't have the UN then:
Anyone can start a war and no sanction will be given
UN take any war very seriously and punish those who start a war
Before the UN there were many brutal wars and whoever won would get off free and so whoever lost and no one learned or was punished due to this more wars broke out and carried on occurring.
No structure with dealing with war this means no one was held responsible
A world without the UN is like a school without teachers or a city without any laws either way all hell will break loose
Innocent citizens will die- without response UN there will be no innocent citizens to save- they will have already died.